By David Cromwell
One of the unstated assumptions of the Western international is that we're nice defenders of human rights,
a loose press and some great benefits of industry economics. errors can be made alongside the way in which, maybe even
tragic error of judgement resembling the 2003 invasion of Iraq. however the triumphing view is that the West is
essentially a strength for solid within the wider international. Why Are We the nice men? is a provocative problem
of this fake ideology. David Cromwell digs underneath regular money owed of an important matters comparable to international
policy, weather swap and the consistent fight among state-corporate strength and actual democracy.
The robust evidence-based research of present affairs is leavened via the various formative experiences
that led the writer to question the fundamental delusion of Western benevolence: from schoolroom
experiments in democracy, publicity to radical principles at domestic, and a mercy project whereas at sea;
to an unforeseen come across with former international Secretary Robin prepare dinner, the struggles to put up
hard-hitting journalism, and the founding of Media Lens in 2001.
Read or Download Why Are We The Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind From The Delusions Of Propaganda PDF
Similar Democracy books
An quick bestseller while first released in 1880, Democracy is the crucial American political novel. At its center is Madeleine Lee, a tender widow who involves Washington, D. C. , to appreciate the workings of energy. Pursued via Silas Ratcliffe, the main influential member of the Senate, Madeleine quickly sees adequate of energy and its corrupting impact to final her a life-time.
Even though Latin American international locations have transitioned to democracy, many voters living in peripheral areas proceed to dwell less than undemocratic rule. Democrats and Autocrats experiences the life of subnational undemocratic regimes (SURs) along nationwide democratic regimes. in particular it solutions the subsequent questions: Why do SURs live to tell the tale regardless of nationwide democratization?
Regardless of notable monetary development premiums over the past decade, overseas relief nonetheless performs an important position in Africa's political economies. This e-book asks while, why, and the way international relief has facilitated, or hindered, democratization in sub-Saharan Africa. rather than international relief as a monolithic source, the booklet examines the disparate affects of reduction in particular meant for improvement results and reduction explicitly geared toward democracy merchandising.
During this provocative ebook, Andrew Bacevich warns of a deadly twin obsession that has taken carry of usa citizens, either conservatives and liberals alike. it's a marriage of militarism and utopian ideology, of extraordinary army could wed to a blind religion within the universality of yank values. This mind-set, Bacevich warns, invitations never-ending struggle and the ever-deepening militarization of U.
Extra resources for Why Are We The Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind From The Delusions Of Propaganda
28 yet for the left-hawk commentators – breakthrough Johann Hari, Nick Cohen, David Aaronovitch and the remainder – who supported ‘humanitarian intervention’ in Iraq to convey ‘democracy’ to the long-suffering Iraqis lower than ‘Saddam’s sanctions,’ this used to be alleged to were a ‘moral battle… fought in an ethical approach. ’29 notwithstanding, the type of democracy that used to be truly being applied in Iraq used to be summed up via Iraqi exile Sami Ramadani: ‘Saddam’s outdated right-wing pals, Rumsfeld and co, are recruiting Saddam’s defense males and are ready to drench Iraq in new bloodbaths accurately to prevent its humans from attaining democracy and actual liberation. ’30 For the BBC, as with many of the company media, the inside track script that was once conformed heavily to pronouncements from Washington and London: a script that spoke inanely of a world ‘war on terror’ and of the creation of ‘democracy’ to Afghanistan and Iraq. One merchandise at the flagship this day information programme on BBC Radio four in November 2003 summed up the ‘balanced’ standpoint on supply. Presenter Sarah Montague used to be interviewing veteran US broadcaster Walter Cronkite. the root of the interview used to be a comparability of the battle in Vietnam over thirty years formerly with the current state of affairs in Iraq. Montague stated to Cronkite: ‘And but in the event you do a comparability, simply in crude numbers phrases, we’re speaking of, what, 58,000 who have been killed in Vietnam and purely [pause], we’re as much as virtually four hundred in Iraq. ’31 I emailed Montague later an analogous day, declaring that even though I understood that the focal point of her interview with Cronkite used to be alleged to be the influence of struggle at the US and on americans, why used to be there no point out of the a long way better deaths of Vietnamese humans, very likely numbering over 2 million participants? Her reaction, in complete, used to be: David, I didn’t make point out of the, what, 2 million indochinese killed, nor the, as but, unknown variety of iraqis killed simply because i used to be simply looking to examine American deaths in either wars. I can’t consider my distinctive phraseology however it used to be remiss of me if I didn’t make it transparent i used to be in simple terms relating American deaths. i made a decision to concentration completely at the American part of the stability sheet simply because, as you be aware, that was once the remit of the interview – the influence of the battle on the US and americans. this is often only a moved quickly answer yet please be at liberty to touch me for extra. Sarah32 Why is it that the ‘remit of the interview’ in company information media finds a scientific tendency to target the influence at the US and american citizens, or at the united kingdom and the British? Why is it so not often in regards to the impression of warfare at the Vietnamese or the influence of conflict at the Iraqis? although, Montague had acknowledged ‘feel unfastened to touch me for more,’ so I did simply that the next day to come: pricey Sarah, Many thank you for replying – it’s a lot liked. i locate it noteworthy that during a long six-minute piece on a comparability among Vietnam and Iraq you probably did no longer contemplate it suitable to incorporate connection with the 2 million lifeless Vietnamese at the stability sheet, as you place it.