Activists and courts are utilizing antidiscrimination legislation to erode civil liberties comparable to unfastened speech, the loose workout of faith, and freedom of organization. The books examines how those legislation are being utilized on university campuses and within the office in ways in which threaten our primary freedoms.
Read or Download You Can't Say That!: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws PDF
Similar Law books
“I have studied Rosen’s e-book intimately and am inspired with its scope and content material. I strongly suggest it to anyone drawn to the present controversies surrounding open resource licensing. ” —John Terpstra, Samba. org; cofounder, Samba-Team “Linux and open resource software program have without end altered the computing panorama.
Academy Award–winning filmmaker Errol Morris examines essentially the most infamous and mysterious homicide trials of the 20th centuryIn this profoundly unique meditation on fact and the justice procedure, Errol Morris—a former inner most detective and director of the skinny Blue Line—delves deeply into the notorious Jeffrey MacDonald homicide case.
The main glamorous or even wonderful moments in a felony method come while a excessive courtroom acknowledges an summary precept regarding, for instance, human liberty or equality. certainly, americans, and never a couple of non-Americans, were tremendously stirred--and divided--by the critiques of the splendid court docket, specifically within the region of race relatives, the place the courtroom has attempted to revolutionize American society.
Canon legislation: A Comparative research with Anglo-American criminal thought, through the Reverend John J. Coughlin, explores the canon legislations of the Roman Catholic Church from a comparative standpoint. The creation to the booklet offers old examples of antinomian and legalistic ways to canon legislation (antinomianism diminishes or denies the significance of canon legislation, whereas legalism overestimates the functionality of canon legislations within the lifetime of the Catholic Church).
Extra resources for You Can't Say That!: The Growing Threat to Civil Liberties from Antidiscrimination Laws
See, for instance, Editorial, ‘‘Free the Berkeley 3: HUD vs. loose Speech,’’ Virginian-Pilot , August 18, 1994, p. A20; Editorial, ‘‘No extra Speech Police,’’ Boston usher in , September three, 1994, p. 12; Editorial, ‘‘Intimidating Political Protest,’’ see notice 6; MacDonald, see word 1; Justin Raimondo, ‘‘The Hidden time table of Radical Egalitarians,’’ San Francisco Examiner , August 17, 1994, p. A17. Memorandum from Roberta Achtenberg, Assistant Secretary for reasonable Housing & equivalent chance, U. S. division of Housing & city improvement (September 2, 1994) (on dossier with author). See Roberta Achtenberg, ‘‘Sometimes on a Tightrope at HUD,’’ Washington submit , August 22, 1994, p. A17. See Editorial, ‘‘Government by means of Intimidation,’’ Washington put up , February 26, 1996, p. A18. Achtenberg, see word 10, p. A17. Deval L. Patrick, Letter to the Editor, Washington put up , February 19, 1996, p. A24. usa v. Wagner , Civ. No. 3:94-CV-2540-H, 1995 WL 841924, p. *5 (N. D. Tex. December eleven, 1995). White v. Julian , 227 F. 3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2000). Salisbury condo, Inc. v. McDermott , No. CIV. A. 96-CV-6486, 1998 WL 195693, p. *10 (E. D. Pa. Mar. 24, 1998); Michigan Prot. & Advocacy Serv. , Inc. v. Babin , 799 F. Supp. 695 (E. D. Mich. 1994). Quoted in Jeremy Rabkin, ‘‘Developers Nail unfastened Speech,’’ American Spectator , December 2000, p. forty six. Robyn E. Blumner, ‘‘Political Correctness Threatens to Swallow unfastened Speech,’’ St. Petersburg instances , September 19, 1999; Eugene Volokh, ‘‘Is Criticizing Affirmative motion unlawful in Chicago? ’’ loose Speech & Election legislations information , summer season 1999, p. 10. Volokh, see be aware 18. For Deming’s account, see David Deming, ‘‘Free-Speech Hypocrisy on the collage of Oklahoma,’’ entrance web page journal , January 25, 2001. Lucia Perri, Letter to the Editor, The Oklahoma Gazette , to be had at Oklahoma ladies Organizing for swap site, www. contributors. aol. com/okamwoc/deminged. html. ‘‘Bats within the Belltower: Sexual Harassment by way of Analogy,’’ Clarion , Vol. four, March/ April 2000, on hand on the Pope heart for better schooling site, www. popecenter. org/clarion/2000/mar-apr/bats. html. Ed Godfrey, ‘‘Professor’s Letter attracts Ire,’’ February 26, 2000, to be had at Oklahoma girls Organizing for swap website, http://members. aol. com/okamwoc/ddeming. html. Ibid. ‘‘Bats within the Belltower,’’ see notice 22. Deming, see be aware 20. See Brown v. Board of Trustees of Boston college , 891 F2d 337, 350–51 (1st Cir. 1989); J. Edward Pawlick, Freedom Will triumph over Racism and Sexism (Wellesley, Mass. : Mustard Seeds included, 1998), pp. 221–23. Ibid. , p. 227. Wirtz v. uncomplicated, Inc. , 786, 787 (D. Nev. 1966). Sweeney v. Keene nation collage , 569 F. second 169, 179 (1st Cir. 1978). Walter Olson, The Excuse manufacturing unit (New York: loose Press, 1997), p. 256. See, for instance, Federal principles of facts 403. The comic strip will be considered at www. detnews. com/AAEC/summer99/kirk/kirk. html. ‘‘St. Paul Human Rights Director documents grievance over Pioneer Press Cartoon,’’ Pioneer Press , June 10, 1999. V. Cullum Rogers, ‘‘Kirk Anderson caricature Stirs Tempest in St. Paul,’’ www. detnews.